Determinants of Performance Related Pay For Rewarding Executives (A Study in the Engineering Sector of Pune Region)
Keywords:
No KeywordsAbstract
This is an empirical paper based on the author's study in the greater Pune region. Her doctoral research centered on Performance Based Rewards for Indian Executive, particularly to align shareholders interests with the executive remuneration.
Conducted during the period 2000 to 2001, as a part of her doctoral work, the findings have since been reaffirmed, with due modifications. The research was undertaken across ten different sectors, encompassing over fifty organizations, for conducting a comparative study of rewards, as they configure in Performance Related Pay (PRP).
This paper is an offshoot of the doctoral research carried out by the author; the data for this paper has been gathered from 10 major engineering industrial establishments. The research paper has been used as means of developing several propositions that link different determinants for PRP, in the engineering firms, as part of compensation strategy and their effectiveness in achieving the outcome from such initiative. The underlying argument is that effectiveness at realizing intended pay strategies depends significantly on the existence of a match between compensation strategies, organization and environment. Respondents are managers responsible for compensation policies in these firms. The relationships among compensation strategies, organization characteristics and environment are explored. The findings may help authors conceptualize, and practitioners manage the relationship between reward processes and strategy in organizations.
Though the investigation revolves around a comparative study of the various factors considered within each organization for administering PRP, the purpose of the investigation is to determine what constitutes a company's decision in incorporating certain determinants as vital to reward employees, by way of variable pay. Out of this comparative study emerged a set of parameters that could be considered homogenous, and which could be taken as a basis of accepted practice for the purposes of both delineating people management policies and benchmarking people management practices for reward management. Such factors were then espoused as determinants considered critical by the said organizations for the effective implementation of PRP plans. Therefore the determinants included in this study as critical for the success of PRP plan initiative are - Quantum Distribution of PRP to basic salary. Seminal Factors for Administering PRP, Types of PRP Plans used and Coverage of PRP Plan. While selecting determinants for a reward system, it was felt that the end must be kept in mind, such as the purpose behind variable system of pay.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
It is herein agreed that:
1.I/We will not publish above said contribution anywhere else without the prior written permission of the publisher unless it has been changed substantially.
2.I/ We declare and warrant that the shared contribution is original, excerpts for such excerpts from copyrighted works as may be included with the permission of the copyright holder and author thereof, that it contains no libelous statements, and does not infringe on any copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, proprietary right of others. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors.
3.The author also warrants that he/ she has the right to enter into this agreement, the research paper/ book review/ articlecontains no libelous or unlawful statements, contains no instructions that may cause harm or injury and does not violate the copyright or trademark, or infringes on the right or the privacy or others; and that all statements in the article asserted as facts are either true or are based upon reasonable research.
4.I/ We agree to indemnify the Editors of IMR against all claims and expenses arising from any breach of warranty from me/us in this agreement.
References
Arnold, W and Plas, M. J.(1993), The Human Touch, John Wiley and Sons, Singapore
Benardin,j.h.and Russel,E.A.(l993), Human Resource Management, McGraw Hill
Brookes, D., (Jan 1993), "Merit Pay Does It Help or Hinder Productivity ?" HR Focus
Bowditch, J. L. (1994), Organisational Behavior, Wiley
Blocher, Chin, Lin, (1999), "Cost Management", Mc Graw Hill
Cameron. J. (1994), "Reinforcement Reward and Intrinsic Motivation" I
Colin Pitts (1995), Motivating Your Organisation, McGraw Hillpp.
Deci, E. L., (1970), The Effects of Contingent Rewards, Premium Publication, New York
Deci and Ryan(1991), Motivation and Work Behavior, Mc Graw Hill
Denny and Richard (1994), Motivate to Win, Kogan Page Ltd, London
Dessler Gary (1998), Management, McGraw-Hill
Dyer, L. And Theriault, R. (1976), The Determinants of Pay Satisfaction, Journal of Applied Psychology, Manch,
Francis Neole, (1991), Performance Management, Short run Press
Gellerman, W.S. (1992), Motivation in the real World, Penguin Books Ltd
Gerald, E., Ledforol, Edward and Lawler III (1995), Reward and Innovation in Fortune 1000 companies,Prentice Hall
Hamlon, C. (1994), "Consequences of Gains Sharing,"A Field Experiment
Harold Koonz, (1991), Management, a Global perspective, McGrawHill
Haslett, S, (June, 1995), Broadbanding, A strategic tool for organisational Changes Compensation and Benefits Review
Haslett. S. (1995), "Broad banding :AStrategic Tool for Organisational Charge.
Kanungo, N.R, Mendowca, (1994), Work Motivation Models for Developing Countries, Sage Publications
Lawler, E.E. (1971), Pay and Organisational Effectiveness, New York
Ledford, G. E., (1995), "Reward Innovations in Fortune 1000 Companies," Lucia Press, U.S.A.
Leventhal G.S. (1980), What should be done with Equity theory. Advances in theory and Research, New York, Plenum Press