Innovative Teaching-Learning Practices for Higher Education Institutes - Mumbai (India)
Keywords:
Innovation, Teaching Learning, Higher Education, Technology, Teaching Pedagogy.Abstract
The education sector has undergone a massive change right from the tradition methods of teaching that involved to learn through memorization and recitation techniques to the current modern pedagogies that induce critical thinking and problem-solving methods. The entire change in the system of teaching- learning has ensured that a student becomes rational thinker, knowledgeable, and self-sufficient. The creativity and innovation in the teaching pedagogy has ensured that both students and teachers benefit and have changed the landscape of the education with more empowered individuals, stronger governance, and development of human capital in the country. The current disruption in the education sector is due to the Covid-19 pandemic, which has further opened gates to creativity and innovation increasing the use of online platforms and change in teaching-learning pedagogy for both teachers and students. The paper focuses on secondary data and discussion with faculties of other institutes. This research paper focusses on studying the different teaching-learning practices proposed by universities and technical bodies and adopted by higher educational institutes in the Mumbai district. This research paper focusses on the innovative teaching-learning practices at the institutes in Mumbai District.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Brewer, D., & Tierney, W. (2012). Barriers to innovation in the US education, in Wildavsky, B., Kelly, A., & Carey, K. (Eds). Reinventing Higher Education: The promise of Innovation. Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 11 40. ISBN-978-1-9347-4288-4
Bradfield, R. ; Cairns, G. ; & Wright, G. (2015). Teaching Scenario Analysis An action learning pedagogy. Journal Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 100, pp. 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.05.005.
Bayram, L. (2012). Use of Online Video Cases in Teacher Training. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 47, pp. 1007-1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.770
Cornali, F. (2012). Effectiveness and efficiency of educational measures. Evaluation Practices, Indicators and Rhetoric. Sociology Mind, 2(3), pp. 255-260. Doi: 10.4236/sm.2012.23034
Christensen, C., & Overdorf, M. (2000). Meeting the Challenge of disruptive change. Harvard Business Review, 2 (78), pp. 47–76. Available at https://hbr.org/2000/03/meeting-the-challenge-of-disruptivechange.
Chesler, M., & Fox, R. (1966). Role Playing Methods in the Classroom. Science Research Associates, Chicago. ISBN-10: 05741771312
Deepika, V., & Kalaiarasan, M. (2012). The Role of language lab in learning English as a second language. Journal of Technology for ELT, 2(2). ISSN 2231 4431.
Evans, R., & Leppmann, P.K. (1970). Resistance to Innovation in Higher Education: A Social Psychological exploration focussed on television and the establishment. The Jossey -Bass Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA.
Gonzalez, P.B.; Graziela, B., Gonzalez, M.; Rozenfeld, M.; & Aurelio, M. J. (2015). Education through Movies: Improving teaching skills and fostering reflection among students and teachers. Journal of Learning through the Arts, 16 (1). https://doi.org/10.21977/D911122357.
Hoffman, A., & Holzhuter, J. (2012). The evolution of higher education: innovation as natural selection, in Hoffman, A., & Spangehl, S. (Eds), Innovation in Higher Education: Igniting the spark for Success. American Council on Education, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., Lanham, MD, pp. 3 -15. ISBN: 978-1-44220446-1
Bose, A., & Jehan, A. (2018). Impact of Group Discussion as a teaching learning method in performance of poor performers in the subject of Anatomy. International Journal of Scientific Research, 7(3). ISSN no. 2277-8179.
Noguera, M.; Budden, C. M.; Silva, A. (2011). Assessing Usage and Maximizing Finance lab impact: A case Exploration. American Journal of Business Education, 4(4).
Osolind, K. (2012). Revolutionary vs evolutionary innovation. Reinvention Consulting. https://www.reinventioninc.com/revolutionvsevolution . Accessed on September 25, 2021.
Perry, G. & Talley, S. (2001). Online video case studies and teacher education. A new tool for pre-service teacher education. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 17 (4), 26-31. Doi: 10.1080/10402454.2001.10784422.
Shelton, J. (2011). Education innovation: what it is and why we need more of it. Education Week, Sputnik post. https://www.edweek.org/education/opinioneducationinnovation-what-it-is-and-why-we-needmore-of-it/2011/09. Accessed on September 26, 2021
Sidhu, G. K.; Yean, Y.F.L., Jean, H. L.; & Abdelhai, E. A (2019). Knowledge and understanding of Google Classrooms as a Teaching and Learning Tool.: A Case Study. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(8), pp. 687-695. ISSN: 2005 4238.
Roessingh, H., & Chambers, W. (2011). Project-Based Learning and Pedagogy in Teacher Preparation: Staking out the Theoretical Mid-Ground. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), pp. 60 -71. ISSN 1812 -9129.
Tang, L. (2021). The Effective Application of Moot Court in Law Teaching. Information Processing and Advanced Education, International Conference on Computers, pp. 240 243. https://doi.org/10.1145 /3456887.3456940.
US Department of Education (2004). What do we mean by innovation? https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oii/about/definition.html. Accessed on September 26, 2021.
Vieluf, S., Kaplan, D., Klieme, E. and Bayer, S. (2012). Teaching Practices and Pedagogical Innovation: Evidence from TALIS, OECD Publishing. https://dx.doi/10.1787/9789264123540-en.
Yu, D., & Hang, C.C. (2010). A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), pp. 435 452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009. 00272.x
Yang, J., Pan, H., Zhou, W., & Huang, R. (2018). Evaluation of smart classroom from the perspective of infusing technology into pedagogy. Smart Learning Environment. https: //doi.org/10.1186/s40561-0180070-1.
